Artificial Intelligence and the Religious Imagination of the Future: A Comparative Study of Eschatology, Soteriology, and Technological Utopianism

Authors

  • Zhanyi Li Lanzhou University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/yv2h3253

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Eschatology, Soteriology, Technological Utopianism, Religion and Technology, Futures Imaginaries

Abstract

Contemporary discourses surrounding artificial intelligence are increasingly framed in terms of radical futures: superintelligence, existential risk, human transcendence, and civilizational rupture. These narratives often present themselves as secular and scientific, yet they display striking structural similarities to classical religious doctrines of eschatology and soteriology. This article offers a philosophical and comparative analysis of artificial intelligence futures through the lens of religious studies, arguing that contemporary AI imaginaries reproduce key elements of religious end-time and salvation narratives in a secularized form. By comparing AI discourse with traditions of eschatology, soteriology, and apocalyptic expectation, the study reveals the implicit religious dimensions embedded within technological utopianism and catastrophe narratives. The paper further argues that these AI-driven future visions reshape contemporary understandings of hope, redemption, and responsibility, often displacing ethical agency from communal and moral practices to technical systems. Rather than dismissing AI futures as mere ideology, the article contends that recognizing their quasi-religious structure is essential for critically assessing their cultural power and normative implications.

References

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity Press.

Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of hope (N. Plaice, S. Plaice, & P. Knight, Trans.). MIT Press.

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

Cave, S., & Dihal, K. (2020). Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(2), 74–77.

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.

Danaher, J. (2020). Automation and utopia: Human flourishing in a world without work. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00386-2

Floridi, L. (2022). AI ethics: A rethinking of its key concepts and challenges. Minds and Machines, 32(1), 1–15.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

Geraci, R. M. (2018). Temples of the future: Religion and the culture of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press.

Hauskeller, M. (2016). Palgrave handbook of posthumanism in film and television. Palgrave Macmillan.

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Viking.

Löwith, K. (1949). Meaning in history: The theological implications of the philosophy of history. University of Chicago Press.

Moltmann, J. (1993). Theology of hope: On the ground and the implications of a Christian eschatology (J. W. Leitch, Trans.). Fortress Press. (Original work published 1964)

Noble, D. F. (2020). The religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention. Penguin Books. (Original work published 1997)

Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking.

Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2021). Transhumanism as a secularist faith. Religions, 12(4), 241.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence and the Religious Imagination of the Future: A Comparative Study of Eschatology, Soteriology, and Technological Utopianism. (2025). Studies on Religion and Philosophy, 1(4), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.71204/yv2h3253

Similar Articles

1-10 of 15

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.