Reconstructing Identity and Negotiating Meaning: De-institutionalized Pathways of Religious Identity in the Digital Age

Authors

  • Jian Li Shanxi University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/t8f71s03

Keywords:

Religious Identity, De-Institutionalization, Digital Religion, Individualized Spirituality, Buddhism

Abstract

Buddhism for China’s digital‑native youth now unfolds less in monasteries than on the endlessly scrolling timelines of Douyin, Bilibili, and WeChat, where Zen‑style décor ads, three‑second tea ceremonies, and pastel Amituofo memes appear as algorithmic coincidences. How, in the absence of ritual apprenticeship or clerical authority, do such fragmented, commercialised encounters coalesce into a felt conviction of “being Buddhist”? This paper answers by fusing the lived‑religion turn to everyday practice, Wellman’s networked individualism, and cultural‑schema theory with Mahāyāna categories of upāya (skillful means), pratītyasamutpāda (dependent origination), and anātman (non‑self). The resulting De‑Institutionalised Buddhist Identity Construction (DBIC) model specifies a four‑phase, recursive mechanism: (1) Ambient Contact delivers unsolicited Buddhist stimuli via platform algorithms and lifestyle branding; (2) Schema Resonance activates dormant scripts of karma, compassion, or serenity; (3) Peer Legitimation supplies micro‑affirmations through influencer cues and chat‑thread encouragement; and (4) Ritual Bricolage converts resonance into modular, self‑curated practices—five‑minute metta sessions, virtual incense burns, eco‑vegetarian “compassion meals.” Each practice leaves digital traces that intensify subsequent exposures, forming feedback loops that echo dependent‑origination logic. Five propositions render the model empirically testable, linking exposure patterns, network structure, bricolage diversity, and identity stability. By reframing narrative coherence as a functional rather than ontological yardstick—valid if it reduces dukkha and fosters altruism—the study challenges authenticity debates rooted in Western selfhood assumptions. It also coins algorithmic soteriology, suggesting recommender systems can, when aligned with upāya, serve as inadvertent pedagogues. Implications span temple strategy (from gatekeeping to curated digital pathways), mental‑health practice, and policy design that balances religious expression with protection against pseudo‑spiritual commodification. Although grounded in Chinese Buddhism, DBIC offers a transferable lens on post‑institutional religiosity across platformised faith traditions.

References

Alisauskiene, M., & Maslauskaite, A. (2021). Religious identity and family practices in a post-communist society: the case of division of labor in childcare and housework. Religions, 12(12), 1040.

Bahroun, A. (2018). 'WeChat wants to become the everyday': an ethno-semiotic study of computerized media, between industries and practices, in Shanghai and Chengdu (2015-2017).

Cederman, L. E. (2005). Computational models of social forms: Advancing generative process theory. American journal of sociology, 110(4), 864-893.

Cho, Y. (2023). Atmospheric buddhism: How buddhism is distributed, felt, and moralized in a repressive society. Journal of Religious Ethics, 51(4), 701-719.

Francis, D., Kellaher, L., & Neophytou, G. (2020). The secret cemetery. Routledge.

Jokinen, K. (2022). Sosiologia ja kulttuurintutkimuksen" kulttuurinen käänne". Teoksessa U. Kovala, K. Eskola, K. Jokinen, V. Niinikangas & E. Sironen (toim.) Tarkkoja siirtoja.

Mah, Y. B. (2004). Critical contextualization of Chinese folk beliefs and practices: Feng Shui as a case study. Asbury Theological Seminary.

Nisar, T. M. (2025). Personalization and Digital Social Markets: Disrupting the Capitalist Economy. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Parameswaran, R. E. (2004). Spectacles of gender and globalization: Mapping Miss World's media event space in the news. The Communication Review, 7(4), 371-406.

Radich, M. (2016). Contemporary Theories of the Body. Refiguring the Body: Embodiment in South Asian Religions, 17.

Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning (Vol. 9). Cambridge University Press.

Takagi, D. Y. (2008). Form and emptiness: Globalization, liberalism, and Buddhism in the West. Amerasia Journal, 34(1), 1-29.

Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 8(3), JCMC834.

Zapart, J. (2017). The Buddha as I: Selfhood and Identity in Śrīmālādevī-siṃhanāda-sūtra. Studia Religiologica. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 50(2), 145-161.

Zeng, S., Peng, Z., & Wu, L. (2021). Is there a role of religion? The moderation role of religious identity and religious practice between traditional media usage and moral evaluation. Religions, 12(2), 137.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-03

How to Cite

Reconstructing Identity and Negotiating Meaning: De-institutionalized Pathways of Religious Identity in the Digital Age. (2025). Studies on Religion and Philosophy, 1(2), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.71204/t8f71s03

Similar Articles

1-10 of 11

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.