Religious Subjectivity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence:The Reshaping of Religious Experience under Technological Rationality from a Buddhist Perspective

Authors

  • Wan Xing Donghua Chan Temple Author
  • Lei Chuan Donghua Academy of China Studies Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/j8shvv59

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Rationality, Buddhist Philosophy, Religious Subjectivity

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has moved from being an external instrument to an environment that increasingly mediates attention, interpretation, and judgment. In religious life, this shift is not merely practical; it is structural. It reconfigures how religious experience is organized, how authority is distributed, and how religious subjectivity is formed. This article examines these transformations through a Buddhist philosophical lens, arguing that the rise of “algorithmic rationality” (a data-driven, predictive, optimizing mode of reason) reshapes the experiential conditions presupposed by Buddhist practice—especially the cultivation of mindfulness (smṛti), concentration (samādhi), and wisdom (prajñā). Drawing on core Buddhist doctrines—dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda), non-self (anātman), the dynamics of craving and grasping (tṛṣṇā/upādāna), and the ethical primacy of intention (cetanā)—the paper analyzes how AI reorganizes the field of experience by: (1) externalizing and commodifying attention, (2) delegating hermeneutic labor to machine mediation, (3) accelerating temporality and weakening the pedagogical value of “slow practice,” (4) introducing a new form of authority that is opaque yet persuasive, and (5) intensifying subtle forms of attachment to metrics, personalization, and cognitive convenience. The article distinguishes the legitimate instrumental use of AI from its deeper tendency to colonize meaning-making and proposes a Buddhist-informed normative framework: “technological non-appropriation,” “digital restraint,” and “contemplative accountability.” It concludes that Buddhism can engage AI constructively only by reasserting the irreducibility of liberation to optimization and by safeguarding the soteriological structure of practice against the reification and outsourcing of subjectivity.

References

Ahmed, S., Sumi, A. A., & Aziz, N. A. (2025). Exploring Multi-Religious Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. Theology and Science, 23(1), 104-128.

Chattopadhyay, M. (2022). Contemplation: its cultivation and culmination through the Buddhist glasses. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 800281.

Chowdhury, S. B. (2022). Unfolding Dependent origination: a Psychological analysis for Disclosing the root of the afflictive State of Mind. Journal of International Buddhist Studies, 13(1), 11-43.

Ma Rhea, Z. (2018). Buddhist pedagogy in teacher education: cultivating wisdom by skillful means. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 199-216.

O'Donnell, A. (2015). Contemplative pedagogy and mindfulness: Developing creative attention in an age of distraction. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 49(2), 187-202.

Tampubolon, M., & Nadeak, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence and understanding of religion: A moral perspective. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 11(8), 903-914.

Umbrello, S. (2023). The intersection of Bernard Lonergan’s critical realism, the common good, and artificial intelligence in modern religious practices. Religions, 14(12), 1536.

Wuthnow, R., & Cadge, W. (2004). Buddhists and Buddhism in the United States: The scope of influence. Journal for the scientific study of religion, 43(3), 363-380.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Religious Subjectivity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence:The Reshaping of Religious Experience under Technological Rationality from a Buddhist Perspective. (2025). Studies on Religion and Philosophy, 1(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.71204/j8shvv59

Similar Articles

11-19 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.