Ambiguity and Reconstruction Mechanisms of Religious Spaces in the Process of Urbanization

Authors

  • Alexei Ivanov Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/n1v51g31

Keywords:

Religious Spaces, Urbanization, Spatial Ambiguity, Decentralization, Spirituality, Urban Sociology

Abstract

In contemporary urban landscapes, traditional religious spaces, once defined strictly by physical boundaries of temples, churches, mosques, and other sacred places, increasingly exhibit ambiguity and fluidity. Driven by rapid urbanization, secularization trends, decentralization of urban planning, and a global resurgence of spirituality, religious practices and experiences frequently transcend conventional religious boundaries, integrating into diverse urban contexts. This study critically examines how religious spaces manifest ambiguity within urbanization, exploring mechanisms underlying their reconstruction in response to modern socio-spatial changes. Through interdisciplinary theoretical lenses such as spatial theory, post-secularism, and religious sociology, combined with case studies of diverse urban environments, the study elaborates on the structural, social, and spiritual factors influencing the reshaping of religious spatial boundaries. Findings indicate a marked departure from traditional spatial logic, highlighting the emergence of hybrid, ephemeral, and decentralized forms of urban religious spaces. The implications underscore a significant shift in understanding religion’s role within contemporary urban contexts, suggesting critical revisions for urban planning and religious governance.

References

Knott, K. (2008). Spatial theory and the study of religion. Religion Compass, 2(6), 1102-1116.

Knott, K. (2015). The location of religion: A spatial analysis. Routledge.

Lefebvre, H. (2012). From the production of space. In Theatre and performance design (pp. 81-84). Routledge.

Mazumdar, S., & Mazumdar, S. (2004). Religion and place attachment: A study of sacred places. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(3), 385-397.

Salvatore, A. (2004). Making public space: opportunities and limits of collective action among Muslims in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(5), 1013-1031.

Smart, A., & Smart, J. (2003). Urbanization and the global perspective. Annual Review of anthropology, 32(1), 263-285.

Thomas, J. (2021). Religion and the public sphere: the spatial theory of Michel de Certeau and religious space (Doctoral dissertation, Middlesex University/Oxford Centre for Mission Studies (OCMS)).

Van der Tol, M., & Gorski, P. (2022). Secularisation as the Fragmentation of the Sacred and of Sacred Space. Religion, state & society, 50(5), 495-512.

Vazquez, M. L. (2022). End of secular city limits? On law’s religious neutrality in the city. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 35(1), 259-286.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-03

How to Cite

Ambiguity and Reconstruction Mechanisms of Religious Spaces in the Process of Urbanization. (2025). Studies on Religion and Philosophy, 1(2), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.71204/n1v51g31

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.